Comments on: Is Ubuntu the new Linux? http://jorgebernal.info/2008/08/15/is-ubuntu-the-new-linux/ Sat, 17 Mar 2012 09:28:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Brian Owens http://jorgebernal.info/2008/08/15/is-ubuntu-the-new-linux/#comment-362 Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:09:05 +0000 http://koke.amedias.org/?p=199#comment-362 Interesting point of view. I’ll consider changing my mind about this but for now I still don’t see things the same way you do.

]]> By: Jorge Bernal http://jorgebernal.info/2008/08/15/is-ubuntu-the-new-linux/#comment-361 Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:04:16 +0000 http://koke.amedias.org/?p=199#comment-361 I see it correctly at http://feeds.feedburner.com/Koke

]]> By: Cord Covers http://jorgebernal.info/2008/08/15/is-ubuntu-the-new-linux/#comment-360 Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:24:54 +0000 http://koke.amedias.org/?p=199#comment-360 I tried to subscribe to your feed but it didn’t show up on my homepage at yahoo.com. Is it working correctly?

]]> By: oliver http://jorgebernal.info/2008/08/15/is-ubuntu-the-new-linux/#comment-359 Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:24:12 +0000 http://koke.amedias.org/?p=199#comment-359 And on http://shoooes.net/downloads/ they even use the Ubuntu logo for “(Linux, BSD)” – ouch. That makes me wonder whether the toolkit actually works on any Linux besides Ubuntu, or on BSD at all :-D

@DreadKnight: how often have you already drawn the Vista/MacOSX/Ubuntu/Tux logo?

]]> By: UbuntuArte » Blog Archive » ¿Linux se llamará Ubuntu? http://jorgebernal.info/2008/08/15/is-ubuntu-the-new-linux/#comment-358 Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:07:13 +0000 http://koke.amedias.org/?p=199#comment-358 [...] Reflejo del fuerte impulso de Ubuntu lo encontramos en  una página shoooes.net que coloca el simbolo de Ubuntu en el lugar de Linux. Fuente. [...]

]]> By: Alan http://jorgebernal.info/2008/08/15/is-ubuntu-the-new-linux/#comment-357 Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:12:32 +0000 http://koke.amedias.org/?p=199#comment-357 RE: RMS — While he is technically correct in saying that it is a GNU+Linux Operating System. Ubuntu is much more than a Linux kernel and GNU tools, which technically just gives you a text mode interface. RMS is *NOT* a marketing guy. Linux is easy to say, GNU is not. GNU is an amusing acronym but it is not marketing friendly like the word “Ubuntu”. If we went by RMS’ speak we should be saying, “Ubuntu, a GNU+Linux+Xorg+OpenOffice dot org+Mozilla operating system” and that is never going to happen.

]]> By: Jeremy http://jorgebernal.info/2008/08/15/is-ubuntu-the-new-linux/#comment-356 Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:08:42 +0000 http://koke.amedias.org/?p=199#comment-356 I had a similar experience IRL a good many years ago. I saw a sign that said something like “Requires Windows 2000 or later, or Linux 8.1 or later” — obviously a result of Red Hat’s dominant position (at the time).

]]> By: DreadKnight http://jorgebernal.info/2008/08/15/is-ubuntu-the-new-linux/#comment-355 Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:30:32 +0000 http://koke.amedias.org/?p=199#comment-355 @Mackenzie: Tux may be cuter, but it doesn’t mean it makes a good logo. Good logos = simple designs most of the time. (KISS rule has a great value when it comes to logo designs; the more easier to remember&draw by non artist, the better; also tux = a penguin, which hardly have individualism from one to another ~ all the same, but lot of duplicated effort xD )

]]> By: Ali http://jorgebernal.info/2008/08/15/is-ubuntu-the-new-linux/#comment-354 Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:13:15 +0000 http://koke.amedias.org/?p=199#comment-354 Just like using the IE icon to refer to the Internet :)

]]> By: Vadim P. http://jorgebernal.info/2008/08/15/is-ubuntu-the-new-linux/#comment-353 Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:36:25 +0000 http://koke.amedias.org/?p=199#comment-353 Check out this website too: http://www.uptodown.com/

Ubuntu is making other distros cry :\

]]>